Home Blog Friends of Lower Cape Fear Cement, Lies, and Videotape!
Cement, Lies, and Videotape!
Tuesday, 30 June 2009 12:50

(Ok, we don’t have videotape, but we’ve got the other two in spades.)


Remember all those statements by Titan officials denying they were trying to get out of the State Environmental Policy Act (SEPA) review? Or the recent letter by local Titan/WID advocate Bob Warwick to Governor Bev Perdue that all of Titan’s activities have been “very ethical and very appropriate.” Well emails between Titan representatives and state officials obtained under the Freedom of Information Act paint quite a different picture. The e-correspondence from last summer shows just how far Titan will go to avoid SEPA, which originally applied to Titan’s project when it was first announced more than a year ago. SEPA would force Titan to wait on all state permits until the Federal Environmental Impact Statement (EIS) is complete—a process expected to take 18 – 24 months. Titan was able to get the SEPA requirement dropped sometime in late 2008 and we’ve always wondered how they did it. Well, now we’ve seen some of the emails--and it seems pretty apparent.

 

In July 22, 2008 Marino Papazoglou, Director of Business Development for Titan America, got an email from a Titan America lawyer with a summary of things that trigger a SEPA review. Mr. Papazoglou forwards the email to contacts at the Department of Commerce, to lobbyist John Merritt, to the CEO of Wilmington Industrial Development (WID) Scott Satterfield, to New Hanover County Manager Bruce Shell and to Steve Yost, marketing manager for North Carolina Southeast’s—an economic development outfit that supports the Titan project. In the email, Mr. Papazoglou says that Titan wants their air permit issued by the end of 2008, but NC regulations require they wait until the wetlands permit (which triggered the Federal Environmental Impact Statement) is complete. Mr. Papazoglou goes on to say “I am not comfortable with the State’s position, because we do not know, what, if any, new regulations may be established by the new administration(s).” He then follows with a question to the email recipients, in which he asks “…can we change the incentives package offered by the State and the County to become credits instead of grants? This change will automatically eliminate one of the hurdles…..I would also like to hear from [Commerce and NC Southeast’s officials] on why we were not made aware of the link between SEPA and incentives in the past and whether we can approach [DENR lawyers] and try to help us.”

The hurdles Mr. Papazoglou is referencing are the 4.5 million dollars of State and County money Titan had accepted for their cement project.

And what do you think was the response to Mr. Papazoglou’s question? A very speedy email from Mr. Merritt to say he already had a call scheduled the next morning with then-Secretary of Commerce Jim Fain and others about this issue. Mr. Merritt ends his email with advice to Mr. Papazoglou and the others. “Please, no one make any contact on this matter until you hear back from me.”

Even though Titan has modified its plans three times to remove things that would likely trigger SEPA (such as mining in state wetlands, use of barges, and giving back a $200,000 state railroad grant), company officials still maintain they are not trying to avoid SEPA. This statement is usually followed by their pledge to be good stewards of our environment and to have “the most environmentally friendly cement plant in the U.S.” or the whole world, depending on who’s talking—Marino, Kate McClain, Bob Odom, John Merritt, or Scott Satterfield of WID. In a January 2009 letter to the Star-News, Mr. Papazoglou denied that Titan was trying to avoid SEPA with a righteous declaration that his company wasn’t trying to “sneak something through the regulatory process.”

For those folks who like to see it for themselves, here’s when the NC Department of Administration—which administers the SEPA law—says it applies:

“What makes a proposed project subject to SEPA?"

"Any project meeting all the following “triggers” is subject to SEPA: (1) the project is carried out with public funds and/or uses state land, (2) a project requires a state approval action in order to be implemented, and (3) a project has the potential for an environmental impact."

"Which “public funds” are applicable under SEPA?"

"Public funds include all expenditures in support of a proposed activity by federal, state, local, or quasi-public entities. It does not include funds used solely for processing a license or a permit, or for the provision of technical services.”


For more on SEPA, click here.

 

And finally…a note about Titan’s pledge that their NC plant will be the most environmentally friendly plant in the world. Sounds great doesn’t it? Even though it’s a bit like saying they’ve got the least leaky oil tanker on the ocean. Unfortunately, it is patently false. When Rep. Carolyn Justice and Rep. Danny McComas met with Titan officials recently, our local legislators asked Titan to meet 6 conditions that would make the Titan project more environmentally friendly, one of which was to match the emissions of the cleanest cement plant in the world—and Titan refused. The only condition Titan did agree to do, was the one thing they are now required to do under the new EPA cement regulations--install continuous emissions monitors.

Looks like we can now add Titan’s claims about avoiding SEPA and building the cleanest cement plant in the U.S. to our ever-growing list of Titanic Tales. As for Mr. Warwick’s claim that Titan has been “very ethical and very appropriate,” we’ll let the citizens be the judge of that.

Remember, Titan is seeking permission to build what would be the 4th largest cement plant in the nation along a stretch of river that is already impaired for mercury. They want to destroy 1,000 acres of wetlands so they can mine above county residents’ primary source of drinking water, their plant will be within 5 miles of where more than 8,500 students will attend school, AND it will emit thousands of tons of criteria pollutants and heavy toxic metals, some of which are known carcinogens. Cement plants are the 4th largest source of airborne mercury emissions in the US; they contribute to 5 % of worldwide CO2 emissions and account for 9 % of all toxic release data reported to the EPA. Cement plants are major industrial polluters. Titan will have a major impact on our environment (and according to more than 200 local doctors, on our public health as well), and they are getting $4.5 million of our public money. This is exactly what SEPA was designed to evaluate and exactly why it should apply. Unless, that is, you are Titan America, a billion dollar company with powerful friends and allies who know how to help avoid a pesky NC regulation intended to protect citizens just like us.

Call Governor Bev Perdue (1-800-662-7952 toll free, or her direct line at 919-733-5811) today and ask her to protect our community. Titan America should follow the law and SEPA should apply.

Comments
Add New Search RSS
Tonya   |2009-07-02 12:39:25
Why in the world dont The govenor not say no to this!!! I think she needs to protect her state if she's govenor! why do we have to call her?!?!?! I am not wanting my child to have Any cancer or Autism! Were already in global warming!!
sherri   |2009-07-06 02:58:02
how many superfund sites,crapped up power plants, plutionium pushers do we already have?
john   |2009-07-07 14:13:51
If cement plants account for 9% of all toxic release data reported to the EPA, is there anywhere to look to see how many times Titan plants in other US locations reported toxic releases over the last few years? And what they released? That would be very interesting.
Paige   |2009-07-07 19:45:32
Keep trucking guys. Not only will this cement plant ruin the environment but it will help transform our world into a concrete palace. BLAH
Lib  - Taxpayer   |2009-07-08 10:38:39
Thanks for writing this information, but who is actually the author of it? Who is making the connections between the possibility of building a superport in Wilmington with this company's hope to have transportation for their cement all over the world? Go to the internet and search for SPP. The secrets planned by Security Prosperity and Protection agreement signed by Bush, Jr., could be added to the fears of our being slowly poisoned by polluted water or running out of water entirely in less than 50yrs. Thank God the doctors are speaking out!
Kelly - FLCF     |2009-07-08 14:40:01
Hi Lib,

The emails referenced in the blog were obtained via a FOIA request. Our group, stoptitan.org has the emails that were used in the blog. We connected the dots regarding SEPA and are asking the question: Did Titan get out of SEPA with the help of Commerce and NC DENR? If so, was this appropriate? Was it legal? We're citizens, not lawyers, so we are trying to bring these issues to the rest of the community, as we uncover new information. We are hoping all the calls from citizens about this issue will bring some exposure to this important fight.
Regarding a connection between the International Port and Titan Cement....honestly, our efforts are solely focused on Titan's Cement plant, so I couldn't comment on it. One interesting thing I learned recently was from a gentlemen I met in the DC airport. He works for a large freight company--his large ships use the big ports at SC and Norfolk, VA. He said an international port here makes no sense because we will never draw in the really big ships that use the big international ports. He said no matter what we do, we'll never compete with SC and Norfolk. His advise was that we should stay as we are, and be a niche port, cator to ships that are smaller. I thought that was interesting, since the premise behind the international port is supposedly to bring more big ships. It makes one wonder doesn't it. Who the heck is behind all these decisions that will cost soooo much money and have the potential for such a negative impact on our region.....and then to learn the port doesn't even make economic sense to one of the largest freight companies in the world. We really need new business leaders to step up. Everybody out there......consider running for public office so we get some good leaders making sound decisions for our area.
Lynn  - NC citizen     |2009-07-27 12:51:06
Do you have these emails posted on our site somewhere...if not, are you going to post them?
Dawn   |2009-07-28 07:20:04
Here on the coast, tourism and fishing are major industries that will be adversely afected by the presence of a cement plan. Fish kills related to high mercury levels will squash both. The repercussions will be more people out of jobs. Not to mention pollution of the environment and risks to pregnant women and children It's just not worth it.
tga  - It's about roads   |2009-07-29 16:35:45
King Rand
By ANTHONY DENT
April 2009
Anthony E. Rand, popularly known as Tony, is currently the number two Democrat in the North Carolina General Assembly. However, he is considered by many to be the de jure ruler of the state Senate and even the state, deserving the title of “king-maker” of North Carolina as an anonymous source referred to him.

Rand began his career in 1981 when he was appointed to the N.C. Senate. He won the following election, and continued to serve until 1988. Then his ambitions shifted towards the governor’s office, so he ran against Republican Jim Gardner for N.C. Lieutenant Governor in 1988.

After a bruising election cycle, Rand was defeated. Sources who wished to remain anonymous look at this as the event that drove Rand to power in the state senate.

“If Rand had won the 1988 election, I suspect he would have run for governor in 1992,” Paul Woolverton of the Fayetteville Observer said in an email. “I have to wonder – if Rand had won the lieutenant governor slot in 1988, would [Senate President Pro Tempore] Marc Basnight have risen in the 1990s to the power he has now? And would Rand have been governor from 2001 to 2009?”

The campaign is chiefly remembered for the vicious attacks against Rand made by Gardner involving drug dealers whom Rand was representing. After the election, Rand disappeared from the political landscape for seven years. In 1995, he ran again for the N.C. Senate representing Cumberland County and won. He has continued to serve in that capacity ever since and was elected Majority Leader in 2001.

Rand was born in 1939 to a family that was very active in the local community, his father serving as mayor of Garner and his mother, a local piano teacher for close to fifty years. He went on to attend the University of North Carolina, where he graduated with a Bachelor of Arts degree in 1961, and a JD three years later. He began working with the law firm of Charlie Rose of Fayetteville who was elected to the U.S. House of Representatives in 1973.

The connections he developed in these early years in Cumberland County built the foundations that led him to high office in Raleigh. The political power that Rand holds is acknowledged by many observers of state politics.

“If he is strongly against a piece of legislation there is no chance of it going somewhere,” Don Carrington of the Carolina Journal said. Conversely, “if he is strongly for something, it has a good chance of going somewhere.”

His colleague, Sen. David Weinstein, the number three Democrat in the Senate, remarked, “Tony is tough, he is abrasive, he borders on being rude, but he is politically astute, and he knows how to use the system to get what he wants done.”

There are many examples of his “abrasive” approach to politics. In 2007, Rand introduced legislation to strip Insurance Commissioner Jim Long of his power to rule on the rates established by insurance companies. This left many people scratching their heads, including the News & Observer who began an editorial saying, “Perhaps Jim Long, North Carolina's insurance commissioner, kicked state Sen. Tony Rand's dog, or scratched the majority leader's shiny new car. Why else would Rand introduce legislation to strip Long of his power to rule on auto, home and workers' comp insurance rates?”

While that explanation was in jest, Dale Gibson of the Triangle Business Journal asked in a column published on April 6, “Could this be ‘get-back legislation’?” He explained that Long obstructed Rand’s attempts to allow Blue Cross Blue Shield of North Carolina to convert to a for-profit status. This bill may be retaliation for the trouble Long caused Rand.

In another example of how Rand can implement his agenda, in 2003, more projects were added to the state Highway Trust Fund for the first time in fourteen years. Began in 1989, the legislature designated seven projects to be funded. These projects have not been completed, (the project in Charlotte being the ...
zoran     |2009-08-23 12:18:47
Please! Stop Titan! They are kiling these beutifull planet..!
Write comment
Name:
Email:
 
Website:
Title:
UBBCode:
[b] [i] [u] [url] [quote] [code] [img] 
 
Please input the anti-spam code that you can read in the image.

!joomlacomment 4.0 Copyright (C) 2009 Compojoom.com . All rights reserved."